We talked to the Head of Compliance for a large financial services company and share his insights below, plus what all companies concerned about compliance can take from this.
Approximately 500 staff and turnover is £50-60m.
The founder of the business comes from an advertising background, and is seriously into technology, so we are a tech heavy business. We do a lot of marketing, which has to be scrutinised by compliance to ensure it meets the regulations.
As one of the largest intermediaries in our sector in the UK, we are definitely on the FCA’s radar.
The compliance team handle all areas of compliance – complaints, customer service, financial promotions etc – they are logged and all actions are recorded through to resolution. So, while no two days are the same, my time is spent monitoring and managing that.
Whilst we spend a fair amount of our time reacting to requests, we also monitor activities with a risk focus to identify potential problems. We pick up on themes which we report back to the business.
The format of our data – the regulator and large financial partners regularly want data interpreted in different ways – how it is currently stored can make that challenging and time consuming.
Regulatory changes are constantly keeping us on our toes. The FCA are very black and white, and the consequences of getting it wrong in their eyes are significant.
Whilst we do get notice of changes the FCA make, it can have a big effect on the business. We have to take commercial decisions about the impact – for example, changes to the way firms can charge for advice on pension transfers caused us to decide to pull out of that market.
There’s always the compromise between the risk to the business versus the commercial needs of the business. The company still needs to operate and deliver a good service – it can be a fine balance.
There’s lots of horizon scanning. We have become adept at foreseeing the direction of travel from the FCA.
We look at what others in our sector are doing.
And, of course, we make recommendations on the best way to adopt practice balancing reducing the risk with the commercial side of the business.
We also work very closely with the company’s Data Protection Officer.
We have risk registers and I work with the individual business teams to identify who has access to what data and why.
Ultimately, the technology security is the responsibility of our IT team, but obviously it concerns us too.
Complaints used to all be logged onto a spreadsheet. Over the course of time, this became more and more complex, with formulae and pivot tables it had become quite a beast! Our internal developers have now built an in house solution, onto our CRM system. That’s had a huge effect as it means we can extract the data any way we want. It means saving time, but also reduces human error too.
AI is showing a lot of promise and I’d love to be able to adopt that into the business. At the moment we only have the resources to sample check each month, and I am always concerned about what’s happened to the rest. But through AI every case could be checked for certain key risks. That comfort of knowing it has all been checked and risks flagged would be great.
Ultimately, you just want an electronic filing cabinet. A system that is robust, easy to access, able to retain data in a way that enables you to interrogate any way you want and its not found wanting.
The thing to remember is that no matter how well the IT team have built it, it’s only as good as the data that’s put into it.
If you would like to learn more about how we can support you with your compliance needs, please contact us on 01784 437 123 to arrange a chat.
If you’d like to learn more about how we can support your IT systems, please get in touch …
The White House, 53 High St, Egham TW20 9EX